Pause before giving a finding a meaning
When a display looks dramatic, it is easy to feel that you must give an immediate answer. A more useful starting point is to describe exactly what is on screen, then explain the limits of that observation.
NLS software uses its own symbols, labels and comparison systems. This lesson does not assign a universal meaning to a colour or number. Consult the documentation for your exact software, and distinguish the manufacturer's explanation from independently validated clinical evidence.
Client report: “I have been feeling tired.”
Software observation: the exact displayed symbol, label and selected view.
Independent evidence: relevant medical assessment or results, where available. A software observation alone cannot establish the cause of the tiredness.
Your six-point interpretation checklist
Save this page or use your browser's Print option to keep the checklist.
Identify the display
Record the device, software build, selected view and exact label or symbol. Check the relevant manual before explaining it. Similar-looking displays need not have identical definitions across systems.
Describe before interpreting
Write what appeared on screen in neutral terms. Keep your interpretation in a separate sentence. A displayed label is not an independently confirmed medical finding.
Listen to the person
Record the client's concern in their own words and any relevant care or independently obtained results. Neither a reassuring nor an alarming screen should override symptoms or appropriate medical assessment.
Check the comparison
If comparing sessions, record the setup, selected view and relevant differences. Repeatability within software does not establish diagnostic accuracy; a changing display does not prove recovery or deterioration.
Explain the boundary
Say what you observed and what remains unknown. Do not infer an infection, deficiency, organ damage or disease stage from a symbol, colour or library match.
Document the next step
Record what you explained, what remains uncertain and any appropriate referral. Do not use the display to advise stopping medication, prescribe restrictive diets or delay medical care.
A fictional case: what would you say?
A client sees a dark symbol in an organ view and asks, “Does that mean my organ is damaged?” You have no independent medical evidence of organ damage.
Consider your answer, then open the reasoning
“This is a display within the software. It does not establish organ damage or tell us how well that organ is functioning. Let's separate what you are experiencing from what the software shows. Symptoms or concerns about organ health need appropriate medical assessment.”
Document the display and your explanation. Do not assign a disease or a disease stage, and do not use a normal-looking screen to rule one out. This case is invented for education; it is not a client result.
Why the evidence boundary matters
UK ASA/CAP guidance states that it has not seen evidence substantiating bioresonance claims to diagnose, prevent or treat disease. This is UK advertising guidance, not a statement of South African law. ASCIA also lists bioresonance among tests it does not recommend for allergy diagnosis.
These sources support the evidence boundaries above. The six-point checklist is an Anavrin educational framework, not a validated diagnostic protocol. Sources reviewed 27 October 2026.
Explore more free reasoning lessons, browse our practitioner ebooks or choose a structured Academy learning pathway.